logo
logo
EN
RU
logo
 

Shagi / Steps the Journal of the SASH

Issues

               
                   
                        
                   
                   
2022 :Vol. 8, N 1Vol. 8, N 2Vol. 8, N 3
2021 :Vol. 7, N 1Vol. 7, N 2Vol. 7, N 3Vol. 7, N 4
2020 :Vol. 6, N 1Vol. 6, N 2Vol. 6, N 3Vol. 6, N 4
2019 :Vol. 5, N 1Vol. 5, N 2Vol. 5, N 3Vol. 5, N 4
2018 :Vol. 4, N 1Vol. 4, N 2Vol. 4, N 34
2017 :Vol. 3, N 1Vol. 3, N 2Vol. 3, N 3Vol. 3, N 4
2016 :Vol. 2, N 1Vol. 2, N 23 Vol. 2, N 4
2015 :Vol. 1, N 1Vol. 1, N 2

SHAGI/STEPS 5(2)

   pdf

Western and Eastern discourses in the diplomatic correspondence of Ivan the Terrible: The role of the comparative method in conceptualizing the phenomenon and in defining the missives corpus

N. A. Kochekovskaya
National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russia, Moscow)

DOI: 10.22394/2412-9410-2019-5-2-157-174

Keywords: Medieval diplomacy, comparative studies, status, titles, hierarchy, rhetoric, etiquette formulas, petition, paying homage, Ivan the Terribles correspondence with Denmark, with Sweden, with the Nogai

Abstract: The central issue of this article is the specific character of diplomatic correspondence in the 16th century and, as a consequence, the difficulty in determining whether or not some examples of Ivan the Terribles correspondence belong to the realm of diplomacy. There were two distinct lines in Ivans diplomatic correspondence with the rulers of Europe and with those of the conventional East; this in addition to the nature of medieval diplomacy as a relationship between the authority and charisma of individual rulers, rather than between independent and equal subjects of international law (as becomes the case by the Early Modern period). In dealing with this problem, this article suggests a comparative analysis of two conditionally distinguished discourses in Ivan the Terribles diplomatic correspondence Eastern and Western ones. However, the model of correspondence used for contacts between the Muscovite State and the successors of the Golden Horde was frequently being extended to the correspondence with European rulers. This took place in those cases where Ivan believed his Western interlocutor unworthy of being granted a status equal to Ivans own and, as a result, used in his missives elements of his correspondence with the successors of the Golden Horde, who by then occupied a lower, semi-subordinate position in Ivans hierarchy of states. The article lays out conclusions regarding the significance of such examples for the theoretical problem of drawing the boundaries between diplomacy and non-diplomacy in the corpus of Ivan the Terribles letters. We show that the the question of how the addressee of Ivans missives was viewed as a diplomatic partner or a vassal was an essential part of the way diplomacy was considered in the 16th century Muscovite State.

To cite this article: Kochekovskaya N. A. (2019). Western and Eastern discourses in the diplomatic correspondence of Ivan the Terrible: The role of the comparative method in conceptualizing the phenomenon and in defining the missives corpus. Shagi / Steps